Heron Reservoir

Heron Reservoir held 66,318 acre-feet on Nov 2, 2026, 16.6% of its full pool: much below normal for the date (the middle of past years is 59.6%).

A storage reservoir: it holds water for later release. On Willow Creek, at the Rio Chama. Rio Grande (Rio Chama) basin.

66,318acre-feet held, Nov 2, 2026
16.6%of the full pool (400,031 acre-feet)
much below normalfor the date; typical 60%
Up 35,106acre-feet over 30 days
47,428acre-feet a year ago (11.9%)

These reservoirs hold water for later use. Percent full is the water held divided by what the reservoir can hold at its full pool, using the capacity that applied at the time.

Last 365 days

Percent of the full pool, against the middle and spread of the same date in other years (the shaded bands: the middle half and the 10th to 90th percentile of past years).

  • Median of past years
  • Percent of full pool
  • 10th–90th percentile of past years
  • Middle half of past years
020406080100%2026MarMayJulSepNov

Show the data as a table

Year by year

The highest, average and lowest percent of the full pool in each calendar year. The latest year is partial. Years whose capacity is less certain are marked in the table below.

  • Highest
  • Average
  • Lowest
0255075100125%19801990200020102020

Show the data as a table

The comparison uses 30 years of 1991-2020 whose capacity figure is published, current-table, high- or medium-confidence, 1991–2020, pooling 3 days either side of each date.

Readings are what the operating agencies report; we have not audited the latest values. Reclamation labels its data "provisional and subject to revision unless otherwise noted."

Year-by-year table, with how well capacity is known
Highest, average and lowest storage by year
YearDaysMost (acre-feet)AverageLeastHighest %Average %Lowest %Capacity figure
202630666,31838,51526,43216.6%9.6%6.6%The operator's current table fits the record
202536579,92656,41127,40720.0%14.1%6.9%The operator's current table fits the record
2024366139,544101,39665,19934.9%25.3%16.3%The operator's current table fits the record
2023365167,70096,48736,24741.9%24.1%9.1%The operator's current table fits the record
202236584,87455,07340,25021.2%13.8%10.1%The operator's current table fits the record
202136599,25861,84540,02224.8%15.5%10.0%The operator's current table fits the record
2020366137,80694,10853,24434.4%23.5%13.3%The operator's current table fits the record
2019365193,157116,16056,09548.3%29.0%14.0%The operator's current table fits the record
2018365168,197118,66756,29442.0%29.7%14.1%The operator's current table fits the record
2017365196,556135,55365,76549.1%33.9%16.4%The operator's current table fits the record
2016366138,45694,95765,68434.6%23.7%16.4%The operator's current table fits the record
2015365140,92088,75662,75935.2%22.2%15.7%The operator's current table fits the record
2014365112,91883,59165,70028.2%20.9%16.4%The operator's current table fits the record
2013365167,062118,78085,73941.8%29.7%21.4%The operator's current table fits the record
2012366266,483223,432167,27466.6%55.9%41.8%The operator's current table fits the record
2011365304,607250,193223,32875.9%62.3%55.6%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
2010365334,670276,503226,68083.4%68.9%56.5%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
2009365343,453282,514243,44185.6%70.4%60.7%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
2008366321,115261,739196,41380.0%65.2%48.9%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
2007365242,023207,567162,30560.3%51.7%40.4%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
2006365211,526185,829150,86252.7%46.3%37.6%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
2005365234,082180,739106,90058.3%45.0%26.6%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
2004366122,861108,59983,21130.6%27.1%20.7%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
2003365198,766153,754123,22749.5%38.3%30.7%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
2002365291,071215,148160,75972.5%53.6%40.1%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
2001365342,486304,447259,47885.3%75.9%64.7%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
2000366379,764326,694267,43694.6%81.4%66.6%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1999365398,328348,143285,59699.3%86.7%71.2%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1998365376,510344,733304,35393.8%85.9%75.8%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1997365366,680328,932263,32091.4%82.0%65.6%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1996366376,680349,214306,22093.9%87.0%76.3%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1995365400,330379,896325,33499.8%94.7%81.1%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1994365402,101383,748334,030100.2%95.6%83.2%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1993365401,038376,467312,36499.9%93.8%77.8%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1992366401,569386,692339,634100.1%96.4%84.6%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1991365401,569379,458313,846100.1%94.5%78.2%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1990365382,401364,390319,50795.3%90.8%79.6%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1989365398,740377,903365,33499.4%94.2%91.0%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1988366396,097383,827345,94498.7%95.6%86.2%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1987365400,448378,379333,49999.8%94.3%83.1%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1986365401,569384,143323,610100.1%95.7%80.6%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1985365401,546376,802317,137100.1%93.9%79.0%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1984366401,300368,091315,400100.0%91.7%78.6%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1983365401,100365,538318,60099.9%91.1%79.4%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1982365401,800354,849291,200100.1%88.4%72.6%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1981365351,600322,921294,20087.6%80.5%73.3%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1980366367,900304,729239,10091.7%75.9%59.6%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1979365301,600231,742145,30075.1%57.7%36.2%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1978365191,600158,113113,60047.7%39.4%28.3%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1977365165,700147,409113,60041.3%36.7%28.3%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1976366207,100184,352140,10051.6%45.9%34.9%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1975365252,800199,536125,90063.0%49.7%31.4%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
19741149,900149,900149,90037.4%37.4%37.4%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported

About this reservoir

The San Juan-Chama Project's main storage. Water diverted from San Juan River tributaries in Colorado arrives through the Azotea Tunnel and is held here for the Project's contractors, chiefly the Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority, the Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District and the City of Santa Fe. Heron is operated to store imported San Juan-Chama water, not native Rio Grande water.

How to use these numbers

  • Imported supply. Heron storage is the clearest single measure of how much Colorado River basin water New Mexico has banked for the middle Rio Grande. It moves independently of Rio Grande runoff.
  • Contractor calls. Releases show when contractors call their water down the Chama, typically for municipal supply or to offset river depletions.
  • Snowpack in the San Juan mountains, not the Sangres. Inflow tracks diversions through the Azotea Tunnel, so a good year here can coincide with a poor year on the Rio Grande.

Read before quoting a number

  • Reclamation's 2010 survey table published in RISE stops at 7,102 ft, far below the operating range. This report uses the complete operator table held in CWMS instead, which reproduces reported storage exactly.
  • Full pool is detected from the record, not taken from a published pool definition.

The dam

Facts about the dam, from the National Inventory of Dams
DamHeron Dam
OwnerBureau of Reclamation (Federal)
Operated withBureau of Reclamation
TypeRockfill, Earth
Purposes, per the dam registryIrrigation, Water Supply
Completed1971
Height269 feet
Hazard classHigh
Registry capacity429,646 acre-feet at most, 401,317 normal. Owner-reported and not corrected for sediment.

National Inventory of Dams, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

How capacity is known

Capacity comes from the operator's elevation-to-storage table (USBR, effective 2020-01-01), checked against the storage the operator reports. Since the table took effect, it reproduces reported storage from reported elevation to within 0 acre-feet in the median (0.00% of storage), across 2,498 days. Where an older table was in force, we recover its capacity from the record and say how well supported it is.

Pool elevations and capacity
PoolElevation (ft)Capacity now (acre-feet)Where it comes from
Full poolused as 100%7,186.1400,031detected from the record: 309 days at or above 7,186 ft and none above 7,187 in 52 years
Capacity over time (2 tables in force)
The capacity of the pool used as 100%, by period
PeriodCapacity (acre-feet)How well supported
1974-12-31 to 2011-12-311974-2011 table401,333Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
2012-01-01 to 2026-11-02current table400,031The operator's current table fits the record

Rivers

Data and sources

Record from 1974 (53 years with readings), through Nov 2, 2026. Where several agencies report the same reservoir, we take each day's value from the first in this list that has one:

  • Bureau of Reclamation HydroData: 18,935 days

Year by year (CSV) · Last 365 days (CSV)

Credit: Bureau of Reclamation HydroData; National Inventory of Dams (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). Capacity analysis by New Mexico Water. Data accessed November 4, 2026.