Lake Sumner

Lake Sumner held 14,779 acre-feet on Nov 2, 2026, 41.1% of its conservation pool: normal for the date (the middle of past years is 45.5%).

A flood-control dam with a conservation or recreation pool beneath a much larger flood pool. On Pecos River. Pecos basin.

14,779acre-feet held, Nov 2, 2026
41.1%of the conservation pool (35,917 acre-feet)
normalfor the date; typical 45%
Up 7,220acre-feet over 30 days
13,313acre-feet a year ago (37.1%)
0days this year above the conservation pool

These lakes hold a normal "conservation" or recreation pool and keep a much larger space empty to catch floods. Percent is measured against the conservation pool, so a reading above 100% means flood water is being held back.

Last 365 days

Percent of the conservation pool, against the middle and spread of the same date in other years (the shaded bands: the middle half and the 10th to 90th percentile of past years).

  • Median of past years
  • Percent of conservation pool
  • 10th–90th percentile of past years
  • Middle half of past years
050100150%2026MarMayJulSepNov

Show the data as a table

Year by year

The highest, average and lowest percent of the conservation pool in each calendar year. The latest year is partial. Years whose capacity is less certain are marked in the table below.

  • Highest
  • Average
  • Lowest
050100150200250%198020002020

Show the data as a table

The comparison uses 30 years of 1991-2020 whose capacity figure is published, current-table, high- or medium-confidence, 1991–2020, pooling 3 days either side of each date.

Readings are what the operating agencies report; we have not audited the latest values. Reclamation labels its data "provisional and subject to revision unless otherwise noted."

Year-by-year table, with how well capacity is known
Highest, average and lowest storage by year
YearDaysMost (acre-feet)AverageLeastHighest %Average %Lowest %Capacity figure
202630624,00313,3332,67566.8%37.1%7.4%Capacity published by the operator for that year
202536522,69117,8059,02163.2%49.6%25.1%Capacity published by the operator for that year
202436624,27014,4414,67867.6%40.2%13.0%Capacity published by the operator for that year
202336528,06515,7558,18078.1%43.9%22.8%Capacity published by the operator for that year
202236516,99311,5483,16647.3%32.2%8.8%Capacity published by the operator for that year
202136519,18111,1784,66253.4%31.1%13.0%Capacity published by the operator for that year
202036627,88215,5224,80877.6%43.2%13.4%Capacity published by the operator for that year
201936533,81923,95913,71094.2%66.7%38.2%Capacity published by the operator for that year
201836542,93028,90617,761119.5%80.5%49.5%Capacity published by the operator for that year
201736539,12328,59619,452108.9%79.6%54.2%Capacity published by the operator for that year
201636646,54331,11117,701129.6%86.6%49.3%Capacity published by the operator for that year
201536547,10238,09728,289131.1%106.1%78.8%Capacity published by the operator for that year
201436544,94535,72324,990125.1%99.5%69.6%Capacity published by the operator for that year
201336536,83014,8433,060102.5%41.3%8.5%Capacity published by the operator for that year
201236616,6186,0751,71246.3%16.9%4.8%Capacity published by the operator for that year
201136525,10710,6751,96469.9%29.7%5.5%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
201036531,44719,66413,68987.5%54.7%38.1%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
200936524,51816,5737,76468.2%46.1%21.6%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
200836628,61218,978079.6%52.8%0.0%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
200736573,83725,29617,626205.4%70.4%49.0%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
200636535,33120,67511,77893.9%54.9%31.3%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
200536543,95433,61010,206116.8%89.3%27.1%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
200436623,5739,6212,05062.6%25.6%5.4%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
200336514,7238,5011,61939.1%22.6%4.3%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
200236514,2324,716037.8%12.5%0.0%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
200136540,62718,7603,193107.9%49.8%8.5%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
200036636,44020,6686,51084.0%47.7%15.0%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
199936543,94032,97819,580101.3%76.0%45.2%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
199836542,23024,5098,89097.4%56.5%20.5%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
199736542,79031,22314,82098.7%72.0%34.2%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
199636643,32024,0105,19099.9%55.4%12.0%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
199536537,07026,93219,91085.5%62.1%45.9%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
199436544,88027,73812,200103.5%64.0%28.1%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
199336544,19030,25913,860101.9%69.8%32.0%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
199236664,04039,08812,170147.7%90.1%28.1%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
199136556,77024,6692,600130.6%56.7%6.0%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
199036532,20018,0915,35074.1%41.6%12.3%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
198936536,10022,58312,90083.0%51.9%29.7%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
198836646,46929,12213,730106.9%67.0%31.6%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
198736567,44449,80927,446132.8%98.1%54.0%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
198636568,11145,85927,080134.1%90.3%53.3%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
198536546,20032,3878,68091.0%63.8%17.1%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
198436632,83020,6589,21064.6%40.7%18.1%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
198336538,90020,0324,19076.6%39.4%8.2%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
198236548,36023,5172,84095.2%46.3%5.6%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
198136540,35027,1002,16078.9%53.0%4.2%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
198036691,16043,6951,680178.3%85.5%3.3%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1979365102,50068,91822,920200.4%134.8%44.8%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
197836548,36017,4612,46094.6%34.1%4.8%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
197736540,12023,5133,71078.5%46.0%7.3%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
197636639,90016,8173,44078.0%32.9%6.7%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
197536563,34032,8624,000123.9%64.3%7.8%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1974365102,20046,3843,280199.9%90.7%6.4%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1973356112,40098,24180,520219.8%192.1%157.5%Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
197234980,17036,8003,680156.8%72.0%7.2%Before elevation records began; capacity extrapolatednot used for "this date in other years"
197136559,77033,7824,630116.9%66.1%9.1%Before elevation records began; capacity extrapolatednot used for "this date in other years"
197036585,29058,85927,440166.8%115.1%53.7%Before elevation records began; capacity extrapolatednot used for "this date in other years"
196936574,74051,8913,490146.2%101.5%6.8%Before elevation records began; capacity extrapolatednot used for "this date in other years"
196836674,58054,29219,520145.8%106.2%38.2%Before elevation records began; capacity extrapolatednot used for "this date in other years"
196736572,06051,56110,800140.9%100.8%21.1%Before elevation records began; capacity extrapolatednot used for "this date in other years"
196636565,96041,9262,520129.0%82.0%4.9%Before elevation records began; capacity extrapolatednot used for "this date in other years"
19659245,45041,52636,10088.9%81.2%70.6%Before elevation records began; capacity extrapolatednot used for "this date in other years"

About this reservoir

Reclamation storage for the Carlsbad Project on the Pecos in De Baca County, completed in 1937. Water is released in blocks to move it down to Brantley and Carlsbad.

How to use these numbers

  • Carlsbad Project supply. With Brantley and Santa Rosa, Sumner holds the Pecos irrigation supply.
  • Block releases. Release records show the large block releases used to move water down the Pecos efficiently.

Read before quoting a number

  • The top of the active conservation pool was lowered in June 2012 for dam maintenance, to 4,260.9 ft. The earlier, higher pool is not published in CWMS, so every year is measured against the reduced pool. Before 2012 that overstates percent full, and it counts as flood storage water that was then ordinary conservation storage. Percentages above 100% before 2012 should not be read as floods.
  • Sumner has a flood pool above its conservation pool (Flood Risk Reduction is its primary purpose in the dam registry), so it is treated as a flood-control reservoir here.
  • Pre-2007 capacities are derived from an elevation and storage pairing that is noisy in this record. Treat individual early years as approximate.

The dam

Facts about the dam, from the National Inventory of Dams
DamSumner Dam (formerly Alamogordo Dam)
OwnerBureau of Reclamation (Federal)
Operated withBureau of Reclamation
TypeEarth
Purposes, per the dam registryFlood Risk Reduction, Irrigation
Completed1937
Height164 feet
Hazard classHigh
Registry capacity227,683 acre-feet at most, 63,690 normal. Owner-reported and not corrected for sediment.

National Inventory of Dams, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

How capacity is known

Capacity comes from the operator's elevation-to-storage table (USBR, effective 2026-01-01), checked against the storage the operator reports. Since the table took effect, it reproduces reported storage from reported elevation to within 0 acre-feet in the median (0.00% of storage), across 299 days. Where an older table was in force, we recover its capacity from the record and say how well supported it is.

Pool elevations and capacity
PoolElevation (ft)Capacity now (acre-feet)Where it comes from
Top of conservation poolused as 100%4,260.935,211CWMS level Sumner.Elev.Inst.0.Top of Conservation dated 2025-02-12Top of Active Conservation (2012) Reduction of Maintenance
Top of flood pool4,283.9122,804CWMS level Sumner.Elev.Inst.0.Top of Flood dated 2014-01-01
Top of dam4,302.9218,990CWMS level Sumner.Elev.Inst.0.Top of Dam dated 2014-08-01
Top of entitlement pool4,260.935,211CWMS level Sumner.Elev.Inst.0.Top of Entitlement dated 2025-01-01Top of Entitlement, 2025
Top of inactive pool4,232.32,374CWMS level Sumner.Elev.Inst.0.Top of Inactive dated 2024-01-01
Capacity over time (8 tables in force)
The capacity of the pool used as 100%, by period
PeriodCapacity (acre-feet)How well supported
1973-01-01 to 1981-12-311973-1981 table51,135Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1982-01-01 to 1984-12-311982-1984 table50,797Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1985-01-01 to 1987-12-311985-1987 table50,797Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1988-01-01 to 1991-12-311988-1991 table43,475Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1992-01-01 to 1996-09-161992-1996 table43,366Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
1999-09-29 to 2000-12-311999-2000 table43,366Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
2001-01-01 to 2006-12-312001-2006 table37,646Capacity recovered from the record, well supported
2007-01-01 to 2026-11-022007-2026 table35,944Capacity recovered from the record, well supported

Rivers

Data and sources

Record from 1965 (62 years with readings), through Nov 2, 2026. Where several agencies report the same reservoir, we take each day's value from the first in this list that has one:

  • Bureau of Reclamation HydroData: 22,224 days
  • U.S. Geological Survey NWIS: 63 days

Year by year (CSV) · Last 365 days (CSV)

Credit: Bureau of Reclamation HydroData; U.S. Geological Survey NWIS; National Inventory of Dams (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). Capacity analysis by New Mexico Water. Data accessed November 4, 2026.